\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{cite,longtable}
\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
\topmargin -1.5cm
\textheight 26cm
\textwidth 20cm
\oddsidemargin -2cm
\evensidemargin 0cm
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\title{Check List for Particle : \boldmath{ $\Omega_b^-$}}
\maketitle
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Quantity &\ \ \  Us \ \ \ &\ \ \ PDG \ \ \ &\ \ \  EvtGen \ \ \ & Quantity & \ \ \ Us \ \ \ & \ \ \ PDG \ \ \ & \ \ \ EvtGen \ \ \ \\ 
\hline
PDG  &5332 & & & Mass & 6035.04& &\\ 
Code & & & &      & & &\\ 
\hline 
Width  & 0& & & Gen  & \verb: Omega_b-: & &\\ 
       & & & & Name & & &\\ 
\hline
Decay  & $0.0003624$~m.& & &   & & &\\ 
Length & & & & & & &\\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Latex Name  & $\Omega_b^- $ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & Mass Gen.   & \verb:: \ \ & Width Gen.  & \verb:: \ \ & Type        & baryon \ \ \ \ \ \\ 
& & & & & & & \\ 
\hline
Type        & normal \ \ \ & Con. Mass   & 0 \ \ \ \ & Rating      &$*$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ &Variable    & fixed \\ 
& & & & & & Ratio & \\ 
\hline
Stable & unstable & Spin   & $1/2$& Charge & $-1$ & Colour & 0\\ 
&&&&&&& \\ 
 \hline
Lower Cut & 0& Upper cut & 0& PDG link & & & \\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\begin{itemize}
\item Is the description present and correct?

The $\Omega_b^-$ has not been observed and is only included to complete the lightest multiplet of baryons containing one bottom quark. The mass is calculated using the mass splitting from the charm system and the mass of the $\Lambda_b$ this gives a mass consistent with the theoretical calculations. In the charm system the lifetime of the $\Omega_c$ is significantly lower than the other weakly decaying charm baryons due to interference between the strange quark produced weakly and the spectators. This should not happen for the bottom system so we use the average lifetime for the $b$-baryon admixture from \cite{Yao:2006px}. 

We estimate some exclusive modes by using this estimate of the lifetime and calculated partial widths and use partonic decay modes to model the rest of the decays. The ratios of the partonic decays were calculated using the colour factor for the relative rates of the leptonic and direct $b\to c$ decays, colour exchanged decays were added with one third of the rate for the direct decays. The rates of the different quarks produced in the weak decays were calculated using the CKM matrix elements.
\item References?
\end{itemize}
\setlongtables
\begin{longtable}[t]{|c|c|c|p{1in}|c|p{2.5in}|}
\hline
Branching & Rating & Outgoing  & Description & Decayer &  EvtGen \\ 
Ratio     &        & Particles &             &         & \\ 
\hline
\endhead
\caption{The decay modes of the $\Omega_b^-$ (continues).}
\endfoot
\caption{The decay modes of the $\Omega_b^-$.}
\endlastfoot
\label{tab:5332decaymodes}
0.222100 & $*$ & $s$, $\bar{c}$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.198300 & $*$ & $d$, $\bar{u}$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.091300 & $*$ & $c$, $\bar{u}$, $d$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.084400 & $*$ & $c$, $\bar{c}$, $s$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.048400 & $*$ & $\mu^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\mu$, $\Omega_c^{*0}$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.048400 & $*$ & $e^-$, $\bar{\nu}_e$, $\Omega_c^{*0}$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.025200 & $*$ & $e^-$, $\bar{\nu}_e$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.025200 & $*$ & $\mu^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\mu$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.022600 & $*$ & $\mu^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\mu$, $\Omega^0_c$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.022600 & $*$ & $e^-$, $\bar{\nu}_e$, $\Omega^0_c$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.021600 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $a_1^-(1260)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.015600 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $a_1^-(1260)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.015500 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $D_s^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.013900 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $D_s^{*-}$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.013500 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $\rho^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.012800 & $*$ & $\tau^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\tau$, $\Omega_c^{*0}$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.012500 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $D_s^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.012400 & $*$ & $\tau^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\tau$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.011900 & $*$ & $s$, $\bar{u}$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.011100 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $\rho^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.011000 & $*$ & $d$, $\bar{c}$, $c$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.009900 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $D_s^{*-}$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.009500 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $\pi^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.006900 & $*$ & $\tau^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\tau$, $\Omega^0_c$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004800 & $*$ & $c$, $\bar{c}$, $d$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004800 & $*$ & $c$, $\bar{u}$, $s$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004300 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $\pi^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004300 & $*$ & $\Omega^-$, $J/\psi(1S)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.002600 & $*$ & $\Omega^-$, $\psi(2S)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.002200 & $*$ & $s$, $\bar{c}$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.002200 & $*$ & $d$, $\bar{u}$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001300 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $D^{*-}(2010)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001000 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $D^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000900 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $K^{*-}$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000800 & $*$ & $\mu^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\mu$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000800 & $*$ & $e^-$, $\bar{\nu}_e$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000700 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $D^{*-}(2010)$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000700 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $K^{*-}$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonVector& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000700 & $*$ & $\Omega_c^{*0}$, $K^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000500 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $D^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000300 & $*$ & $\tau^-$, $\bar{\nu}_\tau$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000300 & $*$ & $\Omega^0_c$, $K^-$ & & Herwig::BaryonFactorized::BottomBaryonScalar& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000100 & $*$ & $d$, $\bar{c}$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000100 & $*$ & $s$, $\bar{u}$, $u$, $(ss)_1$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
\end{longtable}Total branching ratio is $1$.
\bibliography{particles}

\end{document}
