\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{cite,longtable}
\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
\topmargin -1.5cm
\textheight 26cm
\textwidth 20cm
\oddsidemargin -2cm
\evensidemargin 0cm
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\title{Check List for Particle : \boldmath{ $\Xi_c^+$}}
\maketitle
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Quantity &\ \ \  Us \ \ \ &\ \ \ PDG \ \ \ &\ \ \  EvtGen \ \ \ & Quantity & \ \ \ Us \ \ \ & \ \ \ PDG \ \ \ & \ \ \ EvtGen \ \ \ \\ 
\hline
PDG  &4232 & & & Mass & 2467.9& &\\ 
Code & & & &      & & &\\ 
\hline 
Width  & 0& & & Gen  & \verb: Xi_c+: & &\\ 
       & & & & Name & & &\\ 
\hline
Decay  & $0.000132$~m.& & &   & & &\\ 
Length & & & & & & &\\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Latex Name  & $\Xi_c^+ $ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & Mass Gen.   & \verb:: \ \ & Width Gen.  & \verb:: \ \ & Type        & baryon \ \ \ \ \ \\ 
& & & & & & & \\ 
\hline
Type        & normal \ \ \ & Con. Mass   & 0 \ \ \ \ & Rating      &$***$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ &Variable    & fixed \\ 
& & & & & & Ratio & \\ 
\hline
Stable & unstable & Spin   & $1/2$& Charge & $1$ & Colour & 0\\ 
&&&&&&& \\ 
 \hline
Lower Cut & 0& Upper cut & 0& PDG link &s045 & & \\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\begin{itemize}
\item Is the description present and correct?

The $\Xi_c^+$ is the charged $\Xi_c$ member of the lightest $\Xi_c$ multiplet. The mass and lifetime have been measured and are taken from \cite{Yao:2006px}. No absolute branching ratio measurements have been made and all the branching ratios are measured relative to the $\Xi^-\pi^+\pi^+$ rate. 

  For the other weakly decaying charm baryons we have used the theoretical calculations of \cite{Korner:1992wi}  to fix the branching ratios of these exclusive modes. However for the $\Xi_c^+$ this would over-saturate the total width. We have therefore fixed the exclusive leptonic decay using the results of \cite{Ivanov:1996fj}  and taken the braching ratio for the reference $\Xi^-\pi^+\pi^+$ mode to be 1\%. The partonic decays are calculated assuming an 8\% branching ratio for the semileptonic decay $c\to s\ell\nu$. The remaining leptonic modes are calculated using the ratio of the CKM matrix elements. The hadronic decays are calculated by including the normal decays and the colour exchanged decays with a factor of $1/3$ the direct decay. The CKM factors are used to calculated the rates for the different quarks produced in the weak decays. The exclusive modes are then subtracted from the relevant partonic mode. The partonic leptonic modes are replaced by multi-body modes due to problems with the hadronization of the leptonic partonic decays.
\item References?
\end{itemize}
\setlongtables
\begin{longtable}[t]{|c|c|c|p{1in}|c|p{2.5in}|}
\hline
Branching & Rating & Outgoing  & Description & Decayer &  EvtGen \\ 
Ratio     &        & Particles &             &         & \\ 
\hline
\endhead
\caption{The decay modes of the $\Xi_c^+$ (continues).}
\endfoot
\caption{The decay modes of the $\Xi_c^+$.}
\endlastfoot
\label{tab:4232decaymodes}
0.494800 & $**$ & $\bar{d}$, $u$, $s$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.159600 & $**$ & $\bar{d}$, $s$, $u$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.036000 & $**$ & $\mu^+$, $\nu_\mu$, $\Xi^0$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy3& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.036000 & $**$ & $e^+$, $\nu_e$, $\Xi^0$ & & Herwig::SemiLeptonicBaryon::BaryonHeavy3& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.029300 & $**$ & $\mu^+$, $\nu_\mu$, $\Xi^-$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.029300 & $**$ & $e^+$, $\nu_e$, $\Xi^-$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.028300 & $**$ & $\bar{s}$, $u$, $s$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.027300 & $**$ & $\bar{d}$, $u$, $d$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.023400 & $**$ & $\Xi^0$, $\rho^+$ & & Herwig::KornerKramerCharm::CharmBaryon1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.017400 & $**$ & $\Xi^0$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^-$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.014700 & $**$ & $e^+$, $\nu_e$, $\Xi^0$, $\pi^0$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.014700 & $**$ & $\mu^+$, $\nu_\mu$, $\Xi^0$, $\pi^0$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.010000 & $**$ & $\Xi^-$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.010000 & $**$ & $\Sigma^{*+}$, $\bar{K}^0$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.010000 & $**$ & $\Sigma^+$, $\bar{K}^0$ & & Herwig::KornerKramerCharm::CharmBaryon1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.009900 & $**$ & $\bar{d}$, $d$, $u$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.009900 & $**$ & $\bar{s}$, $s$, $u$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.008100 & $**$ & $\Sigma^+$, $\bar{K}^{*0}$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.005500 & $**$ & $\Xi^0$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::KornerKramerCharm::CharmBaryon1& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004000 & $**$ & $\Sigma^+$, $K^-$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004000 & $**$ & $\mu^+$, $\nu_\mu$, $d$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.004000 & $**$ & $e^+$, $\nu_e$, $d$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.003200 & $**$ & $\Lambda^0$, $K^-$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.002900 & $**$ & $\Sigma^0$, $K^-$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Mambo::Mambo& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001600 & $**$ & $\bar{s}$, $u$, $d$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001500 & $**$ & $\Sigma^+$, $K^+$, $K^-$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001300 & $**$ & $p^+$, $K^-$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.001200 & $**$ & $p^+$, $\bar{K}^{*0}$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000900 & $**$ & $p^+$, $K^0_S$, $K^0_S$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000700 & $**$ & $\Omega^-$, $K^+$, $\pi^+$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.000500 & $**$ & $\bar{s}$, $d$, $u$, $(su)_0$ & & Herwig::WeakPartonic::WeakPartonic100& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
\end{longtable}Total branching ratio is $1$.
\bibliography{particles}

\end{document}
