\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{cite,longtable}
\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
\topmargin -1.5cm
\textheight 26cm
\textwidth 20cm
\oddsidemargin -2cm
\evensidemargin 0cm
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\title{Check List for Particle : \boldmath{ ${D'}_{s1}^+$}}
\maketitle
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Quantity &\ \ \  Us \ \ \ &\ \ \ PDG \ \ \ &\ \ \  EvtGen \ \ \ & Quantity & \ \ \ Us \ \ \ & \ \ \ PDG \ \ \ & \ \ \ EvtGen \ \ \ \\ 
\hline
PDG  &20433 & & & Mass & 2535.35& &\\ 
Code & & & &      & & &\\ 
\hline 
Width  & 1.3& & & Gen  & \verb: D'_s1+: & &\\ 
       & & & & Name & & &\\ 
\hline
Decay  & $0$~m.& & &   & & &\\ 
Length & & & & & & &\\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Latex Name  & ${D'}_{s1}^+ $ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & Mass Gen.   & \verb:D'_s1+mass: \ \ & Width Gen.  & \verb:D'_s1+width: \ \ & Type        & meson \ \ \ \ \ \\ 
& & & & & & & \\ 
\hline
Type        & normal \ \ \ & Con. Mass   & 0 \ \ \ \ & Rating      &$****$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ &Variable    & fixed \\ 
& & & & & & Ratio & \\ 
\hline
Stable & unstable & Spin   & $1$& Charge & $1$ & Colour & 0\\ 
&&&&&&& \\ 
 \hline
Lower Cut & 13& Upper cut & 13& PDG link &m121 & & \\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\begin{itemize}
\item Is the description present and correct?

This state has been observed and the mass measured. A number of decay modes have been observed but only the ratio of the
two $D^*K$ modes has been measured. We assume that these are the only modes and use the value
\begin{equation}
\frac{\Gamma(D^{*0}K^+)}{\Gamma(D^{*+}K^0)} = 1.27
\end{equation}
  whereas EvtGen assumes the two modes have the same branching ratio.

  It must be noted that due to our convention that the lighter pseudovector state is assigned to the $1^1P_1$ multiplet this is not the same assignment of PDG code as in \cite{Eidelman:2004wy}  which reverses this and the state we assign to the $1^1P_1$ mulitplet, this is however the same as EvtGen.

  The width has not been measured and is taken from the theoretical result of \cite{DiPierro:2001uu}  which is slightly lower than the EvtGen value. The ${D'}_{s1}^+$ is allowed to be off-shell by ten times the width.
\item References?
\end{itemize}
\setlongtables
\begin{longtable}[t]{|c|c|c|p{1in}|c|p{2.5in}|}
\hline
Branching & Rating & Outgoing  & Description & Decayer &  EvtGen \\ 
Ratio     &        & Particles &             &         & \\ 
\hline
\endhead
\caption{The decay modes of the ${D'}_{s1}^+$ (continues).}
\endfoot
\caption{The decay modes of the ${D'}_{s1}^+$.}
\endlastfoot
\label{tab:20433decaymodes}
0.559471 & $*****$ & $D^{*0}(2007)$, $K^+$ & & Herwig::PVectorMesonVectorPScalar::PVectorVP& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.440529 & $*****$ & $D^{*+}(2010)$, $K^0$ & & Herwig::PVectorMesonVectorPScalar::PVectorVP& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
\end{longtable}Total branching ratio is $1$.
\bibliography{particles}

\end{document}
