\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{cite,longtable}
\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
\topmargin -1.5cm
\textheight 26cm
\textwidth 20cm
\oddsidemargin -2cm
\evensidemargin 0cm
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\title{Check List for Particle : \boldmath{ $D_{s1}^+$}}
\maketitle
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Quantity &\ \ \  Us \ \ \ &\ \ \ PDG \ \ \ &\ \ \  EvtGen \ \ \ & Quantity & \ \ \ Us \ \ \ & \ \ \ PDG \ \ \ & \ \ \ EvtGen \ \ \ \\ 
\hline
PDG  &10433 & & & Mass & 2458.9& &\\ 
Code & & & &      & & &\\ 
\hline 
Width  & 0.0382& & & Gen  & \verb: D_s1+: & &\\ 
       & & & & Name & & &\\ 
\hline
Decay  & $0$~m.& & &   & & &\\ 
Length & & & & & & &\\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Latex Name  & $D_{s1}^+ $ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & Mass Gen.   & \verb:D_s1+mass: \ \ & Width Gen.  & \verb:D_s1+width: \ \ & Type        & meson \ \ \ \ \ \\ 
& & & & & & & \\ 
\hline
Type        & normal \ \ \ & Con. Mass   & 0 \ \ \ \ & Rating      &$***$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ &Variable    & fixed \\ 
& & & & & & Ratio & \\ 
\hline
Stable & unstable & Spin   & $1$& Charge & $1$ & Colour & 0\\ 
&&&&&&& \\ 
 \hline
Lower Cut & 0.382& Upper cut & 0.382& PDG link &m173 & & \\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\begin{itemize}
\item Is the description present and correct?

  This state has been observed and the mass measured. A number of decay modes have been observed and ratios of branching ratios measured although there is no fit to the branching ratios in \cite{Yao:2006px}.

  The product of the branching ratios for the production of this state in $B$-meson decays and the branching ratios has been measured. We therefore fit the data on the production of this state with either a $D$ or $D^*$ meson from \cite{Aubert:2004pw}  and \cite{Abe:2003jk}  together with the ratios of branching fractions from \cite{Krokovny:2003zq}  to obtain the branching ratios for its production in $B$ decays together with the branching fractions of $D_{s1}^+$. This assumes that $D_s^+\gamma$, $D^{*+}_s\pi^0$, $D_s^+\pi^+\pi^-$ and $D_s^+\pi^0\pi^0$ are the only modes and that the $D_s^+\pi^+\pi^-$ rate is twice $D_s^+\pi^0\pi^0$ as required by isospin.

  The width is taken from \cite{Bardeen:2003kt} .

  It must be noted that due to our convention that the lighter pseudovector state is assigned to the $1^1P_1$ multiplet this is not the same assignment of PDG code as in \cite{Yao:2006px} which reverses this and the state we assign to the $1^3P_1$ mulitplet.
\item References?
\end{itemize}
\setlongtables
\begin{longtable}[t]{|c|c|c|p{1in}|c|p{2.5in}|}
\hline
Branching & Rating & Outgoing  & Description & Decayer &  EvtGen \\ 
Ratio     &        & Particles &             &         & \\ 
\hline
\endhead
\caption{The decay modes of the $D_{s1}^+$ (continues).}
\endfoot
\caption{The decay modes of the $D_{s1}^+$.}
\endlastfoot
\label{tab:10433decaymodes}
0.656068 & $*****$ & $D_s^{*+}$, $\pi^0$ & & Herwig::PVectorMesonVectorPScalar::PVectorVP& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.206139 & $*****$ & $D_s^+$, $\gamma$ & & Herwig::PVectorMesonVectorPScalar::PVectorVP& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.091862 & $*****$ & $D_s^+$, $\pi^+$, $\pi^-$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.045931 & $*****$ & $D_s^+$, $\pi^0$, $\pi^0$ & & Herwig::Hw64::DecayME0& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
\end{longtable}Total branching ratio is $1$.
\bibliography{particles}

\end{document}
