\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{cite,longtable}
\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
\topmargin -1.5cm
\textheight 26cm
\textwidth 20cm
\oddsidemargin -2cm
\evensidemargin 0cm
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\title{Check List for Particle : \boldmath{ $f_0(1710)$}}
\maketitle
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Quantity &\ \ \  Us \ \ \ &\ \ \ PDG \ \ \ &\ \ \  EvtGen \ \ \ & Quantity & \ \ \ Us \ \ \ & \ \ \ PDG \ \ \ & \ \ \ EvtGen \ \ \ \\ 
\hline
PDG  &10331 & & & Mass & 1718& &\\ 
Code & & & &      & & &\\ 
\hline 
Width  & 137& & & Gen  & \verb: f_0(1710): & &\\ 
       & & & & Name & & &\\ 
\hline
Decay  & $0$~m.& & &   & & &\\ 
Length & & & & & & &\\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Latex Name  & $f_0(1710) $ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & Mass Gen.   & \verb:f''_00mass: \ \ & Width Gen.  & \verb:f''_00width: \ \ & Type        & meson \ \ \ \ \ \\ 
& & & & & & & \\ 
\hline
Type        & normal \ \ \ & Con. Mass   & 0 \ \ \ \ & Rating      &$***$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ &Variable    & fixed \\ 
& & & & & & Ratio & \\ 
\hline
Stable & unstable & Spin   & $0$& Charge & $0$ & Colour & 0\\ 
&&&&&&& \\ 
 \hline
Lower Cut & 411& Upper cut & 411& PDG link &m068 & & \\ 
\hline 
\end{tabular} 
\end{center} 
\begin{itemize}
\item Is the description present and correct?

The $f_0(1710)$ is assigned as the heavier isospin singlet from the lightest scalar multiplet although it could be replaced in this by either the $f_0(1370)$ or $f_0(1500)$. Its mass and width are reasonably well measured, the values we use are taken from \cite{Yao:2006px}. However the branching ratios are not given in \cite{Yao:2006px}. Therefore we have used the values for the ratios
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\Gamma(\pi\pi)}{\Gamma(K\bar{K})} &=& 0.1, \\ 
\frac{\Gamma(\eta\eta)}{\Gamma(K\bar{K})} &=& 0.48\pm0.15,
\end{eqnarray}
 combined with the assumption that there are only $K\bar{K}$, $\eta\eta$ and $\pi\pi$ modes to calculate the branching ratios. While some experiments have observed the $\pi\pi$ mode and calculated a ratio the most recent result is a limit on $\frac{\Gamma(\pi\pi)}{\Gamma(K\bar{K})}$ which is lower than most of the measurements. We have have chosen a value just below this limit. The $f_0(1710)$ is allowed to be off-shell by three times the width.
\item References?
\end{itemize}
\setlongtables
\begin{longtable}[t]{|c|c|c|p{1in}|c|p{2.5in}|}
\hline
Branching & Rating & Outgoing  & Description & Decayer &  EvtGen \\ 
Ratio     &        & Particles &             &         & \\ 
\hline
\endhead
\caption{The decay modes of the $f_0(1710)$ (continues).}
\endfoot
\caption{The decay modes of the $f_0(1710)$.}
\endlastfoot
\label{tab:10331decaymodes}
0.316456 & $***$ & $K^+$, $K^-$ & & Herwig::ScalarScalarScalar::ScalarSS& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.316456 & $***$ & $K^0$, $\bar{K}^0$ & & Herwig::ScalarScalarScalar::ScalarSS& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.303797 & $***$ & $\eta$, $\eta$ & & Herwig::ScalarScalarScalar::ScalarSS& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.042194 & $***$ & $\pi^+$, $\pi^-$ & & Herwig::ScalarScalarScalar::ScalarSS& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
0.021097 & $***$ & $\pi^0$, $\pi^0$ & & Herwig::ScalarScalarScalar::ScalarSS& \\ 
& & & & & \\ \hline
\end{longtable}Total branching ratio is $1$.
\bibliography{particles}

\end{document}
